src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx (1)

Route to title mapping needs to be updated

The current mapping is incomplete. Based on the routes found in App.tsx and the existing map object in UserScreen.tsx, these routes are missing from the mapping:

• /user/organizations
• /user/settings
• /user/chat
• /user/event/:orgId/:eventId

The map object is used to determine translation keys based on the second segment of the URL path (location.pathname.split('/')[2]), and missing mappings will result in undefined translation keys.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 19-27: Verify route to title mapping.

The map object is crucial for determining the correct translation key. Ensure it covers all possible routes and their corresponding title keys.

Let's check for any unmapped routes:

---

Let me gather more context about the existing route mapping by checking the component code.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all possible routes that might need titles
# Look for route definitions that might need to be included in the map
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' "path.*user/[a-zA-Z]+" 

Length of output: 4773

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of UserScreen.tsx to understand the route mapping implementation
cat src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx

Length of output: 4204

src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.test.tsx (4)

90-90: Consider making the test description more specific.

The test name "renders the correct title based on the titleKey for posts" could be more descriptive about the expected behavior.

-  test('renders the correct title based on the titleKey for posts', () => {
+  test('should render "Posts" title when viewing the posts screen', () => {

---

Line range hint 94-111: Ensure proper test isolation.

The test modifies the shared mockLocation variable but doesn't reset it afterward, which could affect other tests. Consider using beforeEach/afterEach hooks for proper test isolation.

+beforeEach(() => {
+  mockLocation = '/user/organization/123';
+});

 test('renders the correct title based on the titleKey', () => {
   mockLocation = '/user/people/123';
   // ... rest of the test
 });

---

Line range hint 112-140: Enhance test maintainability and readability.

Consider these improvements:

1. Add window size cleanup after test
2. Use constants for window sizes
3. Add more descriptive assertion messages

+const MOBILE_WIDTH = 800;
+const DESKTOP_WIDTH = 1000;

 test('LeftDrawer should toggle correctly based on window size and user interaction', async () => {
   // ... setup code ...

-  resizeWindow(800);
+  resizeWindow(MOBILE_WIDTH);
   clickToggleMenuBtn(toggleButton);
-  expect(icon).toHaveClass('fa fa-angle-double-left');
+  expect(icon).toHaveClass('fa fa-angle-double-left', 'Icon should indicate collapsed state on mobile');

-  resizeWindow(1000);
+  resizeWindow(DESKTOP_WIDTH);
   // ... rest of the test ...

+  // Cleanup
+  resizeWindow(window.innerWidth);
 });

---

Line range hint 141-156: Fix critical issues in navigation test implementation.

The test has several issues:

1. The useNavigate mock implementation is incorrect
2. The assertion should check the navigate function call instead of window.location
3. Missing cleanup of mockID

+beforeEach(() => {
+  mockID = '123';
+});

 test('should be redirected to root when orgId is undefined', async () => {
   mockID = undefined;
   const navigate = jest.fn();
-  jest.spyOn({ useNavigate }, 'useNavigate').mockReturnValue(navigate);
+  (useNavigate as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(navigate);
   
   render(
     // ... component render ...
   );
-  expect(window.location.pathname).toEqual('/');
+  expect(navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/');
 });

package.json (1)

11-12: Consider pinning exact versions.

Using caret (^) for version ranges can lead to unexpected behavior if patches include breaking changes. Consider pinning exact versions for more predictable builds:

-    "@dicebear/collection": "^9.2.2",
-    "@dicebear/core": "^9.2.2",
+    "@dicebear/collection": "9.2.2",
+    "@dicebear/core": "9.2.2",

src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (4)

64-66: Remove commented-out code.

These commented-out lines should be removed if the translation functionality is no longer needed.

---

Line range hint 75-89: Add error handling and loading state for chat creation.

The handleCreateDirectChat function should:

1. Handle potential errors from the mutation
2. Show a loading state during creation
3. Provide feedback on success/failure

Consider updating the implementation:

 const handleCreateDirectChat = async (id: string): Promise<void> => {
+  try {
+    setIsCreating(true);
     await createChat({
       variables: {
         organizationId,
         userIds: [userId, id],
         isGroup: false,
       },
     });
     await chatsListRefetch();
     toggleCreateDirectChatModal();
+    // Show success message
+  } catch (error) {
+    // Show error message
+  } finally {
+    setIsCreating(false);
+  }
 };

---

Line range hint 98-112: Improve search functionality implementation.

The current search implementation has limitations:

1. Splitting by space assumes a perfect "firstName lastName" format
2. Doesn't handle multiple spaces or middle names
3. Performs exact matches which might not be user-friendly

Consider using a single search field that searches across both first and last names, or implement a more robust name parsing logic.

---

Line range hint 116-190: Consider consolidating UI libraries.

The component mixes Material-UI and React-Bootstrap components, which can lead to:

1. Inconsistent styling and behavior
2. Increased bundle size
3. Maintenance complexity

Consider standardizing on one UI library throughout the application for better consistency and maintainability.

src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.tsx (1)

211-229: Consider enhancing type safety and readability.

While the null handling is good, we can improve the code further:

Consider this refactoring for better type safety and readability:

-    const allLikes: InterfacePostLikes = likedBy.map((value) => ({
-      firstName: value.firstName,
-      lastName: value.lastName,
-      id: value._id,
-    }));
+    const allLikes = likedBy.map((value): InterfacePostLikes[number] => ({
+      firstName: value.firstName,
+      lastName: value.lastName,
+      id: value._id,
+    }));

-    const postComments: InterfacePostComments =
-      comments?.map((value) => ({
-        id: value.id,
-        creator: {
-          firstName: value.creator?.firstName ?? '',
-          lastName: value.creator?.lastName ?? '',
-          id: value.creator?.id ?? '',
-          email: value.creator?.email ?? '',
-        },
-        likeCount: value.likeCount,
-        likedBy: value.likedBy?.map((like) => ({ id: like?.id ?? '' })) ?? [],
-        text: value.text,
-      })) ?? [];
+    const postComments = comments?.map((value): InterfacePostComments[number] => {
+      const creator = value.creator ?? {};
+      return {
+        id: value.id,
+        creator: {
+          firstName: creator.firstName ?? '',
+          lastName: creator.lastName ?? '',
+          id: creator.id ?? '',
+          email: creator.email ?? '',
+        },
+        likeCount: value.likeCount,
+        likedBy: value.likedBy?.map((like) => ({ id: like?.id ?? '' })) ?? [],
+        text: value.text,
+      };
+    }) ?? [];

Changes:

1. Added explicit type annotations in map callbacks
2. Destructured creator to reduce nesting
3. Improved code structure for better readability

src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.test.tsx (1)

3-3: Consider keeping the waitFor utility.

While removing waitFor in favor of a custom wait function works, the @testing-library/react's waitFor utility is specifically designed for testing async operations and provides better error messages and debugging capabilities.

-import { fireEvent, render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
+import { fireEvent, render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react';

schema.graphql (3)

1095-1095: Consider adding filtering options to venue query.

While the basic query structure is correct, consider adding filtering capabilities similar to other queries in the schema (e.g., where input type) to make it more consistent with the rest of the API.

-  venue(id: ID!): [Venue]
+  venue(
+    id: ID!
+    where: VenueWhereInput
+  ): [Venue]

Consider adding this input type:

input VenueWhereInput {
  name_contains: String
  capacity_gte: Int
  capacity_lte: Int
}

---

1544-1544: Consider adding validation constraints for chat creation.

While the chatInput type contains the necessary fields, consider adding validation constraints:

1. For group chats, name should be required
2. Minimum number of users for group/direct chats

input chatInput {
  isGroup: Boolean!
-  organizationId: ID
+  organizationId: ID!
  userIds: [ID!]!
-  name: String
+  name: String @constraint(
+    minLength: 1
+    maxLength: 50
+    required: true
+    requiredIf: "isGroup"
+  )
}

---

Line range hint 1-1544: Consider implementing consistent pagination pattern across queries.

Some queries use offset-based pagination (skip/first), while others use cursor-based pagination (after/before/first/last). Consider standardizing the pagination approach across all connection types for consistency.

src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx (2)

Line range hint 832-838: Consider enhancing the wait utility function

The wait utility function could be improved for better maintainability and reliability:

1. Add JSDoc documentation
2. Consider increasing the default timeout
3. Add type safety for the return value

+/**
+ * Utility function to wait for async operations in tests
+ * @param ms - The number of milliseconds to wait (default: 500)
+ * @returns Promise<void>
+ */
-async function wait(ms = 100): Promise<void> {
+async function wait(ms = 500): Promise<void> {
   await act(() => {
     return new Promise((resolve) => {
       setTimeout(resolve, ms);
     });
   });
 }

---

Line range hint 840-957: Enhance test coverage for edge cases

The current test suite covers basic functionality but would benefit from additional test cases:

1. Error handling scenarios (network errors, validation errors)
2. User search functionality validation
3. Empty states and loading states
4. Edge cases for user selection

Here's an example of additional test cases to consider:

test('should handle network error when creating chat', async () => {
  // Mock implementation with network error
});

test('should handle empty user search results', async () => {
  // Test empty state rendering
});

test('should show loading state while searching users', async () => {
  // Test loading indicator
});

test('should validate minimum/maximum user selection', async () => {
  // Test user selection constraints
});

src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1588-1677: Consider enhancing test coverage for group chat and sidebar.

While the basic functionality is tested, consider adding these scenarios:

1. Group chat creation with multiple users
2. Form validation for group name
3. Sidebar state persistence across renders
4. Edge cases for different screen sizes

Here's a suggested addition to improve the group chat test:

 test('create new group chat', async () => {
   // ... existing setup ...
   
   fireEvent.click(newGroupChatBtn);
+  // Test form validation
+  const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn');
+  fireEvent.click(submitButton);
+  expect(screen.getByText(/group name is required/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
+  
+  // Test adding multiple users
+  const userInput = screen.getByTestId('userSelect');
+  fireEvent.change(userInput, { target: { value: 'Test User' } });
+  const userOption = await screen.findByText('Test User');
+  fireEvent.click(userOption);
+  
+  // Test group creation
+  const groupNameInput = screen.getByTestId('groupName');
+  fireEvent.change(groupNameInput, { target: { value: 'New Group' } });
+  fireEvent.click(submitButton);
+  await waitFor(() => {
+    expect(screen.queryByRole('dialog')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
+  });

   // ... existing cleanup ...
 });

package.json (1)

11-12: 💡 Codebase verification

Breaking changes detected in dicebear upgrade

The upgrade from v8 to v9 of @dicebear packages requires attention:

• Found active usage in src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx which imports both @dicebear/core and @dicebear/collection
• Multiple test files reference dicebear URLs that may need updates (currently using v5.x API endpoints)
• Git history shows multiple major version jumps (v7 → v8 → v9) with breaking changes

Please ensure:

1. Update API endpoint URLs in tests from api.dicebear.com/5.x to the current version
2. Review dicebear v9 migration guide for breaking changes
3. Update avatar implementation in Avatar.tsx according to v9 API changes

🔗 Analysis chain

Major version upgrade requires careful review.

The upgrade from v8 to v9 of @dicebear packages represents a major version change that may include breaking changes.

Let's verify the changelog and potential breaking changes:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in @dicebear packages

# Test 1: Look for package.json files that might be using these dependencies
echo "Searching for other package.json files using @dicebear..."
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@dicebear"

# Test 2: Look for actual usage of @dicebear in the codebase
echo "Checking usage of @dicebear in the codebase..."
rg "@dicebear" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 349

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find @dicebear usage

# Search for any files containing dicebear (case-insensitive)
echo "Searching for files containing dicebear..."
rg -i "dicebear" --type js --type jsx --type ts

# Look for imports/requires of dicebear packages
echo "Searching for specific dicebear imports..."
ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "@dicebear/$_"'

# Check package-lock.json for current version
echo "Checking package-lock.json for version info..."
rg "\"@dicebear/" package-lock.json -A 3

Length of output: 4907

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for files with common extensions that might use dicebear
echo "Searching for files containing dicebear in source files..."
rg -i "dicebear" -g "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx,vue}"

# Look for any avatar-related components that might use dicebear
echo "Searching for avatar-related files..."
fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx -e vue -g "*avatar*" --exec grep -l -i "dicebear" {} \;

# Check for breaking changes by examining git history
echo "Checking git history for previous dicebear version..."
git log -p package.json | grep -A 2 -B 2 "@dicebear"

Length of output: 10863

src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (1)

27-31: 💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

The return type ApolloQueryResult<string> is incorrect and should be updated

The chatsListRefetch function is used to refresh the chat list after creating a chat, but its return type is incorrectly specified. Based on the USERS_CONNECTION_LIST query definition, it should return a complex object containing user data with firstName and lastName fields, not a string. Update the return type to match the actual query result structure:

Promise<ApolloQueryResult<{
  users: {
    user: {
      firstName: string;
      lastName: string;
    }
  }
}>>

🔗 Analysis chain

Review the Apollo query result type.

While removing any types improves type safety, the return type Promise<ApolloQueryResult<string>> seems incorrect. Apollo queries typically return complex objects rather than primitive strings. Consider using the actual query result type or a more appropriate interface.

Let's verify the actual query result type:

---

Let's gather more information about the query definition and its usage:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the query definition to understand the expected return type
rg -A 5 "USERS_CONNECTION_LIST" --type ts

Length of output: 10922

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full query definition and its return type
rg -A 15 "export const USERS_CONNECTION_LIST = gql" --type ts

# Find where chatsListRefetch is used
ast-grep --pattern 'chatsListRefetch($$$)'

Length of output: 1163

schema.graphql (3)

208-225: LGTM! Well-structured chat type definitions.

The new chat types are well-designed with proper separation between direct and group chats. The types include all necessary fields and maintain consistency in timestamps and IDs.

Consider adding these fields to enhance functionality:

• lastMessage field in both chat types for quick preview
• isTyping field for real-time typing indicators
• readBy field in messages to track message read status

Also applies to: 464-482

---

1558-1567: Add input validation for chat creation.

The input types are well-structured but lack validation constraints.

Consider adding these validations:

• Minimum/maximum length for group chat title
• Minimum number of users (e.g., at least 2 for direct chat)
• Maximum number of users for group chats

Example:

input createGroupChatInput {
  organizationId: ID!
  title: String! @constraint(minLength: 1, maxLength: 100)
  userIds: [ID!]! @constraint(minItems: 2, maxItems: 100)
}

---

732-739: Add support for file attachments in chat messages.

The message sending mutations currently only support text content.

Consider adding file attachment support:

input ChatMessageInput {
  messageContent: String!
  fileAttachments: [Upload]
}

type Mutation {
  sendMessageToDirectChat(
    chatId: ID!
    message: ChatMessageInput!
  ): DirectChatMessage!
}

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Promise<ApolloQueryResult<{
  chats: {
    id: string;
    // other chat fields
  }[];
}>>

src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.tsx (1)

211-228: Consider using object shorthand notation for cleaner code.

The data transformation logic is correct and handles edge cases well. However, we can make it more concise using object shorthand notation where property names match variable names.

Consider this refactor for improved readability:

  const allLikes: InterfacePostLikes = likedBy.map(({ firstName, lastName, _id }) => ({
    firstName,
    lastName,
    id: _id,
  }));

  const postComments: InterfacePostComments = comments?.map(({
    id,
    creator,
    likeCount,
    likedBy,
    text
  }) => ({
    id,
    creator: {
      firstName: creator?.firstName ?? '',
      lastName: creator?.lastName ?? '',
      id: creator?.id ?? '',
      email: creator?.email ?? '',
    },
    likeCount,
    likedBy: likedBy?.map(like => ({ id: like?.id ?? '' })) ?? [],
    text,
  }));

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for related CSS changes that might affect title alignment

# Look for CSS module changes
rg -l "title|heading" --type css

#!/bin/bash
# Check the Posts.module.css file content for heading styles
cat src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.module.css

# Check git history for recent changes to this CSS file
git log -p src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.module.css